Philippines Senate and House of Representatives to probe ‘P50-million drug bribe mess’

">
Philippines Senate and House of Representatives to probe ‘P50-million drug bribe mess’

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Tuesday saw Philippines President, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, direct Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) officials and Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Raul M. Gonzalez to investigate and charge the people involved in an alleged drug bribery attempt involving wealthy Filipino families. The president also instructed the chair of the Dangerous Drugs Board, Vicente Sotto III to keep in custody the drug suspects, the so-called ‘Alabang Boys’. This pending the DOJ‘s reinvestigation of the alleged P50-million bribe mess.

In September, Richard Santos Brodett, age 25, Jorge Jordana Joseph, age 22, and Joseph Ramirez Tecson, age 23, members of the “Alabang Boys”, were arrested in a series of buy-bust operations in Alabang, Muntinlupa City, and Cubao in Quezon City. 60 ecstasy tablets, small bags of marijuana and cocaine sachets were taken from the suspects by the drug agents. The three suspects underwent the DOJ’s preliminary investigation, but the drug case was dismissed by a draft resolution signed by 2 prosecutors from the National Prosecution Service on December 2.

In the challenged resolution, State Prosecutor John Resado, with the recommending approval of Senior State Prosecutor Philip I. Kimpo and Chief State Prosecutor Jovencito Zuño, noted that the police operatives conducted illegal arrests and unlawful warrantless searches on the vehicles of the three suspects. In addition, Joseph was “under the control of the PDEA agents without the presence of any counsel when information against respondent Tecson was extracted from him,” it added.

The PDEA has accused the suspect’s family members of attempting to pay a 50 million Philippine peso bribe to one of the DOJ prosecutors handling the drug case; in exchange the case was to be dismissed. PDEA Special Enforcement Service head Major Ferdinand Marcelino has revealed that the 50 million peso bribe offer to a DOJ prosecutor was merely the first attempt of three. The Tecson family reportedly offered him 3 million pesos which was later raised to 20 million for the release of the suspects. PDEA Legal and Prosecution Service lawyer Alvaro Lazaro affirmed Marcelino’s accusations, which, however, were all denied by the suspects’ families.

The Chief State Prosecutor, Jovencito Zuño, categorically dismissed accusations that 50 million pesos had changed hands, and that he and the prosecutors had been bribed. “It’s not true. That’s a big lie. They’re just speculating,” he said. Zuño has also alleged that the factual findings were first reviewed by state prosecutors Philip Quimpo and Misael Ladaga. The Justice Secretary has ordered the NBI to investigate not only the government prosecutors but also the PDEA.

According to PDEA chief, Ret. Gen. Dionisio Santiago, the “Alabang Boys” – Richard Santos Brodett, Jorge Jordana Joseph and Joseph Ramirez Tecson – are part of an international drug network. “This is a big group, and they use the Internet to get drugs from America. This operation may lead to a bigger one. They (Alabang Boys) are second in line. It’s hard to penetrate the second line,” Santiago explained. (DOJ) Secretary Raul M. Gonzalez on Thursday, however, has asked PDEA Director General Dionisio Santiago to submit evidence to show that money changed hands or had been paid to DOJ prosecutors handling the case amid the pending NBI probe of the matter.

Meanwhile, The Philippines Congress is set to hold Congressional hearings on the case with a view to introducing legislation. “This is a big scandal involving a government agency,” said House vice chairman of committee on illegal drugs, Representative Antonio Cuenco of Cebu City. He has said that the House of Representatives‘ probe will begin on January 5. The three suspects are still detained at the PDEA Quezon City detention centre.

The Senate of the Philippines is also set to conduct hearing on the bribery mess. According to Dangerous Drugs Board chair Vicente “Tito” Sotto III, Sen. Gregorio “Gringo” Honasan, chair of the Senate committee on Public Order and Illegal Drugs, has agreed to lead a Senate inquiry investigating the 50-million peso drug bribe.

In a related drug bust operation, La Union Rep. Tomas Dumpit said that the buy-bust in his province had a ‘similar ending.’ “That’s very possible just like the case in Naguilian, La Union where a shabu (methamphetamine hydrochloride) laboratory was discovered in Barangay Bimotobot, Naguilian, La Union worth one trillion pesos but it was dismissed by the DOJ.” In July, a “shabu” laboratory was searched by the PDEA and the local police, who discovered eight truckloads of equipment and chemicals that could produce 180,000 kilograms of the prohibited drugs. La Union Bishop Artemio Rillera has recently petitioned the President to re-open the cases. On November 12, the DoJ three-member prosecution panel dismissed the cases against former Dagupan police chief Supt. Dionicio Borromeo, four policemen and the shabu laboratory lot owner. Because of the ‘Alabang Boys’ bribery mess, President Arroyo on Tuesday, ordered the reinvestigation of the shabu laboratory case.

This is not the first time that the Philippine judiciary and government had been involved in massive corruption. In the recent GSIS-Meralco bribery case, the High Court dismissed Associate Justice Vicente Q. Roxas, punished Associate Justice Jose L. Sabio, Jr. with 2 months suspension, and reprimanded 2 other CA Justices. In September 2006, Atty. Romeo Roxas accused Justice Minita Chico-Nazario of issuing a ruling for certain considerations, and calling the Supreme Court a “dispenser of injustice”. Roxas said her decision ordering him and one Santiago Pastor to return more than 17 million Philippine pesos to Antonio de Zuzuarregui Jr. was wrong and unjust. Roxas told Nazario: to “sleep well if you still can” and that she would be judged by the “Supreme Dispenser of Justice.” Roxas was cited for indirect contempt and fined 30,000 Philippine pesos.

In April 2007, Philippine Court of Appeals then Presiding Justice Ruben Reyes has ordered an investigation and a regular auditing and inventory of temporary restraining orders (TROs) issued by the 69 CA Justices. Reyes stated: “I will order a monthly or quarterly inventory of TROs, for transparency and to watch the movements of the so-called Dirty Dozen [the 12 most corrupt CA justices].” CJ Reynato Puno said that Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez had not yet submitted the list and the Supreme Court was waiting for its delivery amid her formal investigation against the “Dirty Dozen.”

In September 2007, Lawyer Victor de la Serna has accused Justice Dante Tinga of accepting a 10-million bribe Philippine pesos in the Johnny Chan versus Carmelita Fudot lawsuit, regarding a land located in Doljo, Panglao, Bohol. De la Serna alleged that in the September 26, 2007 meeting, Chan, owner of Bellevue Hotel, paid Tinga 10 million Philippine pesos in exchange for a favorable decision. On September 13, 2007, Tinga penned a decision in favor of Chan’s Cattleya Land Inc., over Fudot, client of De La Serna. The court, however, upheld Tinga, and fined De La Serna 30,000 Philippine pesos for indirect contempt.

In September 2007, Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago has denied charges that she received 10-million Philippine pesos (US$ 224,000) bribe money (as published by The Daily Tribune, Malaya newspaper’s Amado Macasaet and Newsbreak, the previous week).

In January 2005, and December 2006, Philippines Social Weather Stations has released the results of its 2 surveys on corruption in the judiciary. It has reported that: a) “like 1995, 1/4 of lawyers said many/very many judges are corrupt. But (49%) stated that a judges received bribes, just 8% of lawyers admitted they reported the bribery, because they could not prove it. [Tables 8-9]; judges, however, said, just 7% call many/very many judges as corrupt[Tables 10-11] ;b) Judges see some corruption; proportions who said – many/very many corrupt judges or justices: 17% in reference to RTC judges, 14% to MTC judges, 12% to Court of Appeals justices, 4% i to Shari’a Court judges, 4% to Sandiganbayan justices and 2% in reference to Supreme Court justices [Table 15].”

According to the 2008 Political and Economic Risk Consultancy (PERC) report, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia and China are considered among the most corrupt Asian economies. “The Philippines is a sad case when it comes to corruption, and is probably no worse than in places like Indonesia and Thailand,” the report added. PERC has revealed that “the Philippines scored 9.0 out of a possible 10 points under a grading system used by PERC under which zero is the best score and 10 the worst.”

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of the Philippines last week, has affirmed the conviction and 40 years imprisonment sentence of Zeng Wa Shui, a Chinese citizen and Maribel Lagman, his Filipino partner. On March 14, 1996, both had possession, in Angeles City, Pampanga, of more than 600 kilos of liquid shabu and more than 1,600 kilos of ephedrine hydrochloride, a main ingredient in the production of the drug.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Philippines_Senate_and_House_of_Representatives_to_probe_‘P50-million_drug_bribe_mess’&oldid=2611834”

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

What Are The Advantages Of Managed It Services?

What are the advantages of Managed IT Services?

by

Megha Singla

Our present society is based on the unique concept of specialized division of labor where everybody is trained in a certain field where they gain proficiency and expertise. This concept is dependent on the mutual give and take where we subcontract our services to others and hire those support and services which we do not have in-house. With the advanced technology and globalization, this concept has acquired a new dimension where there is no limit of physical boundaries and people from all over the world are connected through the wonderful medium of internet. This diversification of talent pools and numerous options available to select the required support has worked to the advantage of many companies as they can now focus on their core activities and manage the rest through outsourced services.

This phenomenon is most evident in the field of IT consulting and services

industry where more and more people are realizing the advantage of managed IT services. Instead of having a dedicated staff to look after your IT infrastructure and for maintaining your network, it works out to be more economical and effective if you take out the services of a professional company who specialize in this field. This way you are not constrained by your available resources and have access to the expert professionals who are available to you on demand to rectify any IT related problems or to guide you in any upgrade or modification to improve your operations.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hva-a9E_Yvk[/youtube]

There are many companies which offer such kind of services and if you are looking for Managed IT Services

then your best option would be do a little bit of research on the internet. Nowadays the location of service provider is not really important as the statistics show that more than 95% of all IT issues can be diagnosed and resolved through remote access mechanism. In this method, the service provider is able to access your system or the server through internet and run the diagnostic tests to figure out the problem causing the interruption. Moreover they can also make necessary changes in the system settings so that the problem can be corrected and the user can once again perform their normal operation.

However the use of managed IT services NJ is not limited to troubleshooting of current issues. Since these companies are always in touch with the latest developments in the IT industry, they can suggest you the upgrades required to improve your organization’s functioning. Moreover the routine maintenance jobs such as security updates, system scanning, back-up and uploading of user data to secure sites and other such back-end functions can be performed by these service providers in your non working time when the systems are free. This way you save not only the operational costs as you do not have to recruit regular staff for IT management but you also gain on expert technical advice and consultation as well as save on system time for routine operations. Content Source: qwertyc.com/articles/what-are-the-advantages-of-managed-it-services/Albert Thomas

is an internet marketing expert who works for IT related services like

Business IT Services

, Organic Search Engine Optimization, Backup & Recovery Solution, Computer Support NJ, Tech Support NJ,

IT Support NY

etc. around many areas of New Jersey.

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

No Comments | Filed under It Services

American baseball star Rodriguez admits to using performance enhancing drugs

">
American baseball star Rodriguez admits to using performance enhancing drugs

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

American Major League Baseball third baseman Alex Rodriguez, a star player for the New York Yankees, admitted in an interview on sports network ESPN that he used performance-enhancing drugs during 2001 through 2003.

“I did take a banned substance, and for that, I’m very sorry,” Rodriguez told ESPN’s Peter Gammons. “When I arrived at Texas in 2001 I felt an enormous amount of pressure to perform.”

I did take a banned substance, and for that, I’m very sorry.

Last week, Sports Illustrated reported that the baseball player, nicknamed ‘A-Rod’, tested positive in 2003 for Primobolan and testosterone, two substances that have been banned by the league.

During the 2003 season, Rodriguez was playing with the Texas Rangers, and was the winner of the American League MVP Award and was American League leader in home runs. According to sources, Rodriguez was one of 104 players named on a list for testing positive before the 2003 season. The list was compiled in an attempt to determine whether the MLB needed to begin conducting random drug testing.

After the initial report Rodriguez was approached by Sports Illustrated while he was training for the upcoming season in a Miami area gym. At that time, Rodriguez told the reporter “You’ll have to talk to the union.” He was also asked for an explanation of his positive test result, to which he commented “I’m not saying anything.” According to a report by ESPN, sources claim that Rodriguez was aware that he tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs.

However, in December 2007 after United States Senator George J. Mitchell‘s Mitchell Report was released accusing such teammates of Rodriguez as Roger Clemens, Jason Giambi and Andy Pettitte of steroid use, Rodriguez appeared on ABC’s 60 Minutes and declined the use of any steroid or performance-enhancing drug. He also commented that he would not need the help of steroids, stating, “I’ve never felt overmatched on the baseball field. I felt that if I did my, my work as I’ve done since I was, you know, a rookie back in Seattle, I didn’t have a problem competing at any level.”

Senator Mitchell stated in a prepared comment yesterday that his report had only named that players that “had received credible evidence of their illegal purchase, possession, or use of performance enhancing substances.” He pointed out that he “did not have access to the results of the 2003 drug testing, and to this day I do not know which players tested positive then.”

The MLB declined to comment directly on the situation due to court orders on the list of names and documents, but did release a statement: “Information and documents relating to the results of the 2003 MLB testing program are both confidential and under seal by court orders. We are prohibited from confirming or denying any allegation about the test results of any particular player by the court orders. Anyone with knowledge of such documents who discloses their contents may be in violation of those court orders.”

I did not have access to the results of the 2003 drug testing, and to this day I do not know which players tested positive then.

Rodriguez has been one of the many prominent American baseball players over the past few years who has been linked to the use of performance-enhancing drugs. Other prominent names include both the arguably greatest hitter and pitcher in Major League Baseball history, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens. Bonds, the all-time Major League record holder for home runs, was linked to steroid use during the BALCO scandal in 2003, while Clemens was named in the Mitchell report in December of 2007.

The executive vice president for labor relations of Major League Baseball, Rob Manfred, stated that league commissioner Bud Selig was “disturbed” by the linking of steroid use to Rodriguez. Commenting for the league, he said, “Because the survey testing that took place in 2003 was intended to be non-disciplinary and anonymous, we cannot make any comment on the accuracy of this report as it pertains to the player named.”

The report by Sports Illustrated also made the claim that Gene Orza, the COO of the Major League Baseball Players Association informed Rodriguez of a random drug test that occurred in September of 2004, a test that was supposed to remain confidential to all players. The MLBPA denied the accusations, commenting “There was no improper tipping of players in 2004 about the timing of drug tests. In September 2004 MLBPA attorneys met with certain players, but we are not able to confirm or deny the names of any players with whom we met.” When asked in the Sports Illustrated report, Orza declined to comment, stating “I’m not interested in discussing this information with you.”

There was no improper tipping of players in 2004 about the timing of drug tests.

The anonymous testing of players was started in 2003 by the MLB, in order to get a brief estimate of how many players were using performance-enhancing drugs, leading to the beginning of the mandatory, penalty-enforced testing that began in 2004. 1,198 players took the “survey test” in 2003, and the results were later stored in a laboratory in Las Vegas, with codes being used in place of the players names. However, a list of the players actual names that went with the list of codes was kept in a separate office in Long Beach, never intended to ever be together with the codes.

In April 2004, federal agents with search warrants raided the two labs looking for information on the 2003 BALCO scandal test results of 10 players, including Barry Bonds. While searching, they found both the list of names and the codes, including the positive test result of Rodriguez. Following the investigation and raid, the MLBPA informed all 104 players on the list that their positive test data had been sized by the federal agents.

I said in my book Vindicated that he was a known steroid user before 2000. It’s old news. I’ve been saying this forever. You guys are playing catch-up.

Former Major League Baseball star and self-confessed steroid user José Canseco told the media that the news was old, saying “I said in my book Vindicated that he was a known steroid user before 2000. It’s old news. I’ve been saying this forever. You guys are playing catch-up.” In the book, Canseco links Rodriguez to steroids through the claim that he saw him using the drugs. In his first book, Juiced, references to Rodriguez were removed by the publisher of the book because it could not be confirmed that Canseco actually saw Rodriguez taking steroids. According to the publisher, it was only after Canseco passed a lie detector test that information about Rodriguez was allowed into Vindicated.

HAVE YOUR SAY
What do you think the positive test says about steroid use in baseball today? Does the test result affect the way you view Rodriguez’s accomplishments as a player?
Add or view comments

Current senior advisor to the Texas Rangers John Hart commented on the situation in an interview with MLB Network. “I think in the climate that we have today, you don’t have much shock anymore. Obviously Alex probably is the best player in baseball. This has always been a special talent and the guy has been putting up Hall of Fame numbers since the day he showed up in the big leagues. I’ve been in the game for almost 40 years and it hurts a little bit, if in fact this is true. It breaks my heart for the game that we have this kind of thing occurring, But at the same time, a lot of people seem to have been caught in this net,” he said.

Since the positive test occurred in 2003 before penalties were instituted, Rodriguez will most likely not be suspended by the MLB as a result of the situation.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=American_baseball_star_Rodriguez_admits_to_using_performance_enhancing_drugs&oldid=2086148”

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

Category:April 28, 2005

">
Category:April 28, 2005
? April 27, 2005
April 29, 2005 ?
April 28

Pages in category “April 28, 2005”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Category:April_28,_2005&oldid=1082573”

Posted: August 27th, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

The Most Professional Videographers In Dc

byAlma Abell

In the world of law, professionalism, integrity, and attention to detail are attributes which are necessary. The Gore Brothers a company based out of the Washington DC area, have been demonstrating these attributes since 1961 when they began offering litigation support and court reporting services. As a company, they have evolved and made necessary changes over time, staying ahead of the curve both professionally and technologically. When it comes to the legal video industry, they are the finest Videographers in DC.

The services being offered are: reporting and litigation; legal video services; video conferencing and video streaming; and convenient and beautiful conference rooms. With round-the-clock availability, simple on-line scheduling, in-house videographers, and full-service conference rooms, one would be hard-pressed to find a more professional and convenient group of people to work with.

Being the best Videographers in DC means high quality and a dizzying array of the latest technologies. For example, high-definition multiple camera video dispositions; this lets the jury see every angle, facial expressions, and intricacies of body language, creating the most impactful video recordings possible. There is powerful video and transcript synchronizing software, enabling viewing and editing from the convenience of one’s own computer. Also available is high-definition live streaming to an unlimited audience.Money and time also matters, and a professional videography service saves one’s firm, their staff, and their clients tons of money in the long run. With all the arrangements made for you, one does not have to worry about anything other than the case being built. There is no hassle of having to make arrangements, traveling to several locations, or wasting time, energy and money.

Video recordings are the be all, end all in law. The cameras do not lie. This is important for the presentation of concrete evidence, and leveling the playig field. There can be no biased slants or sleights of hand used against one’s clients during dispositions, interviews, settlement conferences, and mediation. Recording and streaming high-definition video assures that law is done correctly.

Videographers are one’s assistants. They help build a stronger and more reliable case, while also streamlining the process and saving firms and their clients money. In law, the facts, evidence and case are what matters and that is where the majority of focus should be.

Posted: August 25th, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Copywriting

News briefs:July 19, 2006

">
News briefs:July 19, 2006

The time is 22:30 (UTC) on July 19th, 2006, and this is Audio Wikinews News Briefs.

[edit]

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=News_briefs:July_19,_2006&oldid=428341”

Posted: August 24th, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

Left-wing EU parliament candidates debate in Cardiff

">
Left-wing EU parliament candidates debate in Cardiff

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Cardiff, Wales —Labour, Plaid Cymru, and No2EU candidates for the Wales seats in the European Parliament met at Cardiff‘s Sandringham Hotel last night for the second of two pre-election hustings debates hosted by Cardiff Trades Union Congress. Cardiff TUC president Katrine Williams moderated as Derek Vaughan of the Labour Party, Jill Evans MEP of Plaid Cymru, and Rob Griffiths of the No2EU coalition, the tops of their respective lists, took questions from an audience of 22 composed largely of socialist activists and trade union members.

Candidates from the Tories, Liberal Democrats, and Green Party were not invited to the evening debate, although the Liberal Democrats did take part in the TUC’s debate earlier in the day. Ms Williams explained that the Liberal Democrats and Tories had been excluded because “we wanted to have candidates more representative of trade unions” but that not inviting the Greens had been “an oversight” due to the less prominent tradition of green politics in Wales. The BNP, UKIP and some minor parties also did not take part.

In opening statements, the three candidates discussed their records and their goals for the European Parliament. Mr Vaughan, leader of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council, asserted the pro-organised labour credentials of the Labour Party, which has been under fire for several years from the left, and noted that Labour, which currently controls two of Wales’s four seats in the EU Parliament, has brought £1.5 billion to Wales, with a comparable amount to come in the future. Calling the BNP “Nazis” and comparing the British political situation to that in Germany in the 1930s, Vaughan called for the parties of the left to rally behind Labour in order to ensure that the BNP did not obtain any seats in Wales; but he expressed resignation to the likelihood that the BNP would earn a seat in North West England.

Ms Evans, meanwhile, who has been an MEP for ten years, announced her opposition to the pro-privatisation current in the EU and pledged that Plaid would support a new program of public investment and pro-organised labour revisions of EU directives, particularly the Posted Workers Directive.

Mr Griffiths, meanwhile, who is General Secretary of the Communist Party of Britain, took a position urging radical reform of the European Union. The Lisbon Treaty, which he characterised as a re-branding of the European Constitution, would, he argued, enshrine neo-liberal policies in Europe and impose them on its member states in a way that was irreversible — “at least by any constitutional means”. Calling for a “social Europe” as opposed to a “United States of Europe“, Griffiths suggested that the creation of a European Defence Agency and the actions of the European Court of Justice were being used to turn the European Union into a capitalist “empire” akin to the United States.

Discussion of the ongoing UK parliamentary expenses scandal and its implications for MEPs, who draw salaries and expenses considerably higher than Westminster MPs do, dominated the early discussion. The Labour candidate expressed the position that the problems in accountability leading to the scandal had been fixed; his opponents noted that of the parties currently representing Britain in Brussels, only Labour has not yet disclosed their expenses (although Mr Vaughan states that the party will begin to do so soon) and Mr Griffiths furthermore declared that the scandal was part of a wider problem: the corruption of the political system by big business.

On the subject of a common European defence policy the three candidates supported widely differing views. The No2EU candidate stated plainly that he considers Europe not to be threatened, and said that a European defence force would be used for foreign adventures in Afghanistan, Africa, and elsewhere in the developing world while at the same time building up the armaments industry in Europe. Ms Evans, meanwhile, argued that the proper role of a common EU force would be as a “civil force” supporting conflict prevention and conflict resolution operations, and also called for the abolition of NATO. Mr Vaughan finished the second round of questioning arguing that a common European armed force should be an alternative to the “US-dominated” NATO, but also stated the importance of bilateral alliances in building up a common European defence force, citing the Franco-German Brigade of the Eurocorps as an example.

Debate ended on the contentious question of MEP salaries, with one member of the audience challenging the three candidates to pledge to accept a wage, if they won, equal to the average wage of their constituents. Ms Evans agreed that the set wage, currently £63,000 rising to £73,000 in 2010, was “too high”, but would not commit to a so-called “worker’s wage”, under heavy criticism from the audience. Mr Vaughan, following, called it “not fair” to ask MEPs to take such a pledge but asserted “I have never been motivated by money” and finished his part in the debate with a call to elect more left-wing socialist MEPs. Mr Griffiths, whose No2EU coalition has made a worker’s wage for MEPs part of their election manifesto, readily pledged to hold to a living wage, albeit not necessarily one equal to the average wage of his constituents, and described some of the difficulties associated with refusing an EU salary, noting that initially No2EU had proposed that its MEPs should draw no salary and claim no expenses from Europe but the coalition’s legal advisors had said that to do so would endanger the status of any of its members as MEPs.

Voting for the European Parliament elections in the United Kingdom takes place June 4.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Left-wing_EU_parliament_candidates_debate_in_Cardiff&oldid=4525459”

Posted: August 21st, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

On the campaign trail, March 2012

">
On the campaign trail, March 2012

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

The following is the fifth in a monthly series chronicling the U.S. 2012 presidential election. It features original material compiled throughout the previous month after a brief mention of some of the month’s biggest stories.

In this month’s edition on the campaign trail, a politician from outside the fifty states receives significant mention as a potential Republican Party vice presidential nominee, Wikinews gets the reaction of three Democratic Party candidates after the party strips delegates from two of their fellow challengers, and a minor third party removes its presidential nominee for fraud.

Posted: August 5th, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized

Excellent Conference Venues, The Ticket To Successful Corporate Events

Submitted by: John Arthur

As an event planner, you know that often the key to a successful conference or corporate event is finding the ideal conference venue for your corporate events.

Firstly, a corporate event can act as a great team building exercise within your company that will help keep employees motivated and on their toes. Secondly, it builds awareness amongst customers and clients on your company s brand and can be vital for a company s growth. This is why conference venues or meeting venues become an essential make-or-break element of a corporate event.

One of the best measurements in a conference venue s effectiveness is if it satisfies the majority of the people involved. The more people that are satisfied by the conference venue, the better the corporate event will proceed. Naturally, the content and effectiveness of your event is extremely important, however setting the right mood by using the perfect venue will be half the battle won.

Here are other measures to help you effectively find conference venues or meeting venues for corporate events:

Look At Previous Corporate Events

If the company has had corporate events in the past, secure a listing of their previous conference venues or meeting venues. Then find out if there has been any repeat business to these venues, this is a great indication that the venue has pleased both you and your attendees.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6cH1s6pEtw[/youtube]

Find out the Budget

Find out the company s budget so you can have an estimated amount to work around. Itemise particulars in your budget list to avoid blowing the budget if unexpected bills come in.

Consider the Location

Location is a very important aspect, so you must consider the following:

Proximity

Make sure that conference venues meet the needs of the corporate events. For example if foreign delegates are expected, place the corporate event in a convenient location near the attendees accommodations. If the company is targeting a wider range of customers, you should look for conference venues that are easily accessible to a wider range of people, for example the venues proximity to public transport and taxi ranks.

Venue Size

This is another aspect you need to consider. Make sure that the venue is neither too small, making the area too cramped for the guests involved, nor so big that it gives the impression that the event is not very well-attended.

Setting

Generally, corporate events are best held in a venue that the event can take place without interruption from the general public. This can be achieved by choosing venues which offer all amenities, meeting rooms etc. in the one facility, however depending on the size of your corporate event and budget you may have some limitations to deal with.

Use Your Imagination

If you are holding a themed corporate event you should look for conference venues that will accommodate a themed party. It is best to check out if the venue can accommodate a stage, lighting etc., so that you can work with the venue to create a fabulous experience for your attendees. The venue will have experience with all sorts of different conferences so it might be worthwhile bouncing some ideas around with them.

Research the Internet

More and more conference venues are going online, making the search for a venue a lot easier and sometimes harder, as there are too many to choose from. How do you know that the promises and photos on the website are true indication of the conference venues facilities and service? Use your common sense and rely on word of mouth or contact one of many companies that do all of the legwork for you, from searching for the most suitable venues to booking your chosen venue for you. All you need to do is input your requirements making the task of finding a conference venue extremely hassle-free!

About the Author: Business Retreats Australia (

businessretreats.com.au/

) has over 20 years of experience in the corporate conference industry. We developed the most comprehensive database of meeting venues for all your corporate events,as well as access to great conference venues in Melbourne.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=847426&ca=Marriage

Posted: August 3rd, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Seniors

Police report drug haul seizure worth up to £30 million in Brownhills, England

">
Police report drug haul seizure worth up to £30 million in Brownhills, England

Monday, December 2, 2013

Police in the West Midlands in England today said nearly 200 kilograms worth of drugs with value possibly as great as £30 million (about US$49 million or €36 million) has been seized from a unit in the town of Brownhills. In what an officer described as “one of the largest [seizures] in the force’s 39 year history”, West Midlands Police reported recovering six big cellophane-wrapped cardboard boxes containing cannabis, cocaine, and MDMA (“ecstasy”) in a police raid operation on the Maybrook Industrial Estate in the town on Wednesday.

The impact this seizure will have on drug dealing in the region and the UK as a whole cannot be underestimated

The seized boxes, which had been loaded onto five freight pallets, contained 120 one-kilogram bags of cannabis, 50 one-kilogram bags of MDMA, and five one-kilogram bricks of cocaine. In a press release, West Midlands Police described what happened after officers found the drugs as they were being unloaded in the operation. “When officers opened the boxes they discovered a deep layer of protective foam chips beneath which the drugs were carefully layered”, the force said. “All the drugs were wrapped in thick plastic bags taped closed with the cannabis vacuum packed to prevent its distinctive pungent aroma from drawing unwanted attention.” Police moved the drugs via forklift truck to a flatbed lorry to remove them.

Detective Sergeant Carl Russell of West Midlands Police’s Force CID said the seizure was the largest he had ever made in the 24 years he has been in West Midlands Police and one of the biggest seizures the force has made since its formation in 1974. “The impact this seizure will have on drug dealing in the region and the UK as a whole cannot be underestimated”, he said. “The drugs had almost certainly been packed to order ready for shipping within Britain but possibly even further afield. Our operation will have a national effect and we are working closely with a range of law enforcement agencies to identify those involved in this crime at whatever level.”

Expert testing on the drugs is ongoing. Estimates described as “conservative” suggest the value of the drugs amounts to £10 million (about US$16.4 million or €12 million), although they could be worth as much as £30 million, subject to purity tests, police said.

Police arrested three men at the unit on suspicion of supplying a controlled drug. The men, a 50-year-old from Brownhills, a 51-year-old from the Norton area of Stoke-on-Trent in Staffordshire, and one aged 53 from Brownhills, have been released on bail as police investigations to “hunt those responsible” continue. West Midlands Police told Wikinews no person has yet been charged in connection with the seizure. Supplying a controlled drug is an imprisonable offence in England, although length of jail sentences vary according to the class and quantity of drugs and the significance of offenders’ roles in committing the crime.

Posted: August 3rd, 2020 by Admin

No Comments | Filed under Uncategorized